Jump to content

Talk:Freja Beha Erichsen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

she is also with Dominique Models in Brussels.

Bababu 19:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tattoos

[edit]

fact source: http://www.thefashionspot.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4678309&postcount=14383

idk how to do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.178.103 (talk) 00:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have included it in the article.24.98.252.13 (talk) 22:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Evelyne[reply]
Forums don't count as sources per WP:RS.  Mbinebri  talk ← 16:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the forum that matters, it's the scans of the articles posted there. 24.126.240.49 (talk)evey —Preceding undated comment added 16:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Cleaned up the article

[edit]

I've edited the article a bit, as well as added more up to date information, with proper sourcing of course. Besides moving a couple of things around, a significant difference I made was remove a second image in which someone uploaded. The main image of her is sufficient enough, I think, and considering the article's length I think any more photos would be too crowding -- and unnecessary.

24.98.252.13 (talk) 22:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Evelyne[reply]

Image

[edit]

I've gone back to the earlier image, as it shows what she sort of "really" looks like. The photos of her on the catwalk are fine, but rather emphasize the respective designer's aesthetics than show this model more or less "au naturel". Any arguments are of course welcome. --Catgut (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care much either way which pic is used, but the one you reverted back to, Catgut, is way too long/tall for an infobox photo IMO (the infobox stretched down further than the external links, and it's not even a stub), so I cropped it on Commons. Hopefully no one minds.  Mbinebri  talk ← 02:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, scrap the crop for the moment, as my image edits are being slightly harassed on Commons.  Mbinebri  talk ← 03:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you're absolutely right, the image's format is not ideal and should be altered in order to conform to the usual requirements. Let's see whether your cropping goes through! --Catgut (talk) 04:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, completely forgot to get that done before. It's cropped now. Another editor was insisting the cropped version be uploaded as a separate file.  Mbinebri  talk ← 16:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Freja Beha Erichsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Freja Beha Erichsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Freja Beha Erichsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Freja Beha Erichsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lesbian comment

[edit]

Just trying to understand the purpose of the comment that Freja is lesbian. I mean do we specifically reference when someone is heterosexual or bi-sexual? I honestly think this comment should be removed. It is a bit demeaning when we'd like to think of humanity as ever "evolving"? Again, too it serves no purpose. Irshgrl500 (talk · contribs) 05:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]